This will be the archive for all the Special Operations Killzone rules posts. I will update it whenever I make a post about the Killzone 40k Skirmish rules. There is a link to this post on the left sidebar of the blog under the GiF Rules Archive heading, it should make this post easy to find. Click on the pic below for the current PDF's 12-09-11
These are the old rules PDF's:
Killzone Rules
Killzone Errata
Killzone Missions
Here is all the background work for the rules.
The Ideas for 40k Skirmish
Basic Rules Changes
Building your Force for Killzone
Playing the game
Scenario I: Encounter
Scenario II: Sentry Grid
Killzone new things to add
Modeling a Killzone Team
Killzone Errata: Codex Space Marines, Space Wolves and Blood Angels
Killzone: Psykers are in, for now
Killzone: Tyranid Errata
Killzone: Inquisition Errata
Killzone: new force building ideas
Killzone: Dark Angels/Black Templars Errata
Thank you!
ReplyDeleteLazy readers of America rejoice!
lol, no prob Mags! It needed to be done.
ReplyDelete-Jim
Hey, been workin' on Orks and IG.
ReplyDeleteQuick question on IG. They have LOTS of units in which its not obvious what the cost of the individual models are (pretty much all of the troops choices). Biggest deal is sarges are better stat wise, but there's no clear way to price them out. Regular platoon is 50 points. So it'd be 5 for each. But the sarge is better. If you make regular guardsmen 4 points each, then the sarge is 14 points. That doesn't make sense. Should sarges just cost more? Or just cost the same as a regular squad member?
As well, on veterans, I figured that both Forward Sentries (defensive grenades and camo cloak) and Grenadiers (carapace armor) made sense to be 3 points per model (30 divided by 10). But demolitions is tricky as one model gets a demo charge and everyone gets a meltabomb. Maybe 2 points for just meltabombs and 10 points for meltabombs and demo charge? Not sure.
IG will be up very soon, sorry for the delay.
ReplyDeleteYou are on the right track with your points value estimations.
Jim
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete